Memorandum of Argument (Index)
In The Supreme Court of Canada
[on appeal from the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)]
Paintings, Drawings, and Photographic Slides of Paintings,
APPLICANT
Her Majesty the Queen,
RESPONDENT
-
- PART I -- STATEMENT OF FACTS
- 1) Overview,
para 1-3
- 2) Factual Background,
para 4-7
- 3) Evidence on the Constitutional Challenge
- a) The Social Science Perspective,
para 8-11
- b) The Law Enforcement Perspective,
para 12
- c) Community Standards,
para 14
- e) The Feminist and Popular Culture Perspective,
para 16-17
- PART II -- POINTS IN ISSUE,
para 18
- PART III -- STATEMENT OF THE LAW
- I. JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
- 1) Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to Grant Leave to Appeal
in this Case,
para 19-22
- 2) The Mootness Issue,
para 23-24
- II. ISSUES ON THE PROPOSED APPEAL
- 1) The "Prior Restraint" Issue,
para 25-32
- 2) The Constitutional Right to An Artistic Defence,
para 33-34
- 3) Statutory Construction vs. Constitutional Remedies:
Section 164 and the Artistic Defence,
para 35-36
- 4) The Freedom of Expression Issue,
para 37
- a) Is s. 163.1 "prescribed by law": The Vagueness Issue,
para 38
- b) Overbreadth and Minimal Impairment,
para 39-41
- c) The Potential Impact of the Law on Artistic Expression,
para 42
- PART IV -- NATURE OF THE ORDER REQUESTED,
para 44
- PART V -- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES,
para 45
(Factum prepared by
Frank Addario and
Paul Burstein, counsel for the Applicant.
Reproduced with permission.)