R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452, 89 D.L.R. (4th) 449-499
Regina v. Butler
- Heading
- Summary
- Cases Cited
- Statutes and Regulations Cited
- Authors Cited
- Counsel
Court Decision. (Appeal allowed; new trial ordered.)
Sopinka J.
(Lamer C.J. and La Forest, Cory, McLachlin,
Stevenson and Iacobucci JJ. concurring)
- 1.
Facts and proceedings
-
Court of Queen's Bench (1989), 50 C.C.C. (3d) 97
- Manitoba Court of Appeal (1990), 60 C.C.C. (3d) 219
-
... Huband J.A. (O'Sullivan and Lyon JJ.A. concurring)
-
... Twaddle J.A., dissenting
-
... Helper J.A., dissenting
- 2.
Relevant legislation
- Criminal Code, s.163, R.S.C., 1985, c.C-46
- 3.
Issues
- 4.
Analysis
- A.
Legislative history
- B.
Judicial interpretation of s.163(8)
- (a)
Section 163(8) to be exclusive test
- (b)
Tests of "undue exploitation of sex"
- (i)
"Community standard of tolerance" test
- (ii)
"Degradation or dehumanization" test
- (iii)
"Internal necessities test" or "artistic defence"
- (iv)
The relationship of the tests to each other
- C.
Does s.163 violate s.2(b) of the Charter?
- D.
Is s.163 justified under s.1 of the Charter?
- (a)
Is s.163 a limit prescribed by law?
- (b)
Objective
- (c)
Proportionality
- (i)
General
- (ii)
Rational connection
- (iii)
Minimal impairment
- (iv)
Balance between effects of limiting measures and legislative objective
- 5.
Conclusion
Gonthier J.
(L'Heureux-Dubé J. concurring)
-
The substance of s.163 of the Code
-
A representation and its content
-
Prohibition and regulation
-
The three-category classification
-
Materials of the third category
-
Tolerance and harm
-
The constitutional validity of s.163 of the Code