JUDGE TO BE SATISFIED

186 [1] An authorization under this section may be given if the judge to whom the application is made is satisfied

[a] that it would be in the best interests of the administration of justice to do so; and

[b] that other investigative procedures have been tried and have failed, other investigative procedures are unlikely to succeed or the urgency of the matter is such that it would be impractical to carry out the investigation of the offence using only other investigative procedures.

[2] No authorization may be given to intercept a private communication at the office or residence of a solicitor, or at any other place ordinarily used by a solicitor and by other solicitors for the purpose of consultation with clients, unless the judge to whom the application is made is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the solicitor, any other solicitor practising with him, any person employed by him or any other such solicitor or a member of the solicitor's household has been or is about to become a party to an offence.

[3] Where an authorization is given in relation to the interception of private communications at a place described in subsection [2], the judge by whom the authorization is given shall include therein such terms and conditions as he considers advisable to protect privileged communications between solicitors and clients.

[4] An authorization shall

[a] state the offence in respect of which private communications may be intercepted;

[b] state the type of private communication that may be intercepted;

[c] state the identity of the persons, if known, whose private communications are to be intercepted, generally describe the place at which private communications may be intercepted, if a general description of that place can be given, and generally describe the manner of interception that may be used;

[d] contain such terms and conditions as the judge considers advisable in the public interest; and

[e] be valid for the period, not exceeding sixty days, set out therein.

[5] The Solicitor General of Canada or the Attorney General, as the case may be, may designate a person or persons who may intercept private communications under authorizations.

[6] Renewals of an authorization may be given by a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge as defined in section 552 on receipt by him of an ex parte application in writing signed by the Attorney General of the province in which the application is made or the Solicitor General of Canada or an agent specially designated in writing for the purposes of section 185 by the Solicitor General of Canada or the Attorney General, as the case may be, accompanied by an affidavit of a peace officer or public officer deposing to the following matters:

[a] the reason and period for which the renewal is required,

[b] full particulars, together with times and dates, when interceptions, if any, were made or attempted under the authorization, and any information that has been obtained by any interception, and

[c] the number of instances, if any, on which, to the knowledge and belief of the deponent, an application has been made under this subsection in relation to the same authorization and on which the application was withdrawn or no renewal was given, the date on which each application was made and the name of the judge to whom each application was made, and supported by such other information as the judge may require.

[7] A renewal of an authorization may be given if the judge to whom the application is made is satisfied that any of the circumstances described in subsection [1] still obtain, but no renewal shall be for a period exceeding sixty days. [1973-74, c.50, s.2; 1976-77, c.53, s.9; 1993, c.40, s.6.]