Bill C-55
If passed, this new law would authorize the government to put
Canadian citizens, who have no criminal record,
and who have not even been charged with a crime,
under round-the-clock electronic surveillance for up to 12 months.
Electronic Frontier Canada
opposes the following section of Bill C-55.
For further analysis,
links to a few related newspaper articles
and excerpts from the Parliamentary debate
are given at the bottom of this page.
Bill C-55 was introduced in Parliament
and given first reading on September 17th, 1996.
It was debated on October 3rd and 4th
and passed second reading on October 7th.
It has now been referred to the Commons Justice Committee.
On December 3rd, Justice Minister Alan Rock acknowledged concerns
of critics and instructed the consider changes to "narrow the scope"
of the new law. (see Globe & Mail article below).
Bill C-55
would amend the Criminal Code
by adding the following:
- Where fear of serious personal injury offence
- 810.2 (1)
Where the Attorney General believes
that there are reasonable grounds
to fear that another person will commit
a serious personal injury offence,
as that expression is defined in section 752,
in respect of one or more persons,
the Attorney General may lay an information
before a provincial court judge,
whether or not the person or persons
in respect of whom it is feared that the offence will be committed
are named.
- Duty of provincial court judge
- (2)
A provincial court judge
who receives an information under subsection (1)
shall cause the parties to appear before the provincial court judge.
- Adjudication
- (3)
The provincial court judge
before whom the parties appear may,
if satisfied by the evidence adduced
that the Attorney General has reasonable grounds for the fear,
order that the defendant enter into a recognizance
to keep the peace and be of good behaviour
for any period that does not exceed twelve months
and to comply with any other reasonable conditions
prescribed in the recognizance,
including conditions set out in subsections (4) and (5),
that the provincial court judge considers desirable
for securing the good conduct of the defendant.
- Conditions -- firearms
- (5)
Before making an order under subsection (3),
the provincial court judge shall consider
whether it is desirable,
in the interests of the safety of the defendant or of any other person,
to include as a condition of the recognizance
that the defendant be prohibited from possessing any firearm
or any ammunition or explosive substance
for any period of time specified in the recognizance
and that the defendant surrender
any firearms acquisition certificate that the defendant possesses,
and where the provincial court judge decides that it is not desirable,
in the interests of the safety of the defendant or any other person,
for the defendant to possess any of those things,
the provincial court judge may
add the appropriate condition to the recognizance.
- Conditions -- reporting and monitoring
- (6)
Before making an order under subsection (3),
the provincial court judge
shall consider whether it is desirable
to include as a condition of the recognizance
that the defendant report to the correctional authority of a province
or to an appropriate police authority
or to comply with a program of electronic monitoring,
if such a program is available in the place in which the defendant resides,
and where the provincial court judge decides
that it is desirable for the defendant to so report or be monitored,
the provincial court judge may add
the appropriate condition to the recognizance.
- Variance of conditions
- (7)
The provincial court judge may,
on application of the Attorney General
or of the defendant,
vary the conditions fixed in the recognizance.
- Other provisions to apply
- (8)
Subsections 810(4) and (5) apply,
with such modifications as the circumstances require,
to recognizances made under this section.
Some Commentary:
Related newspaper articles:
-
Monitoring Justice
Globe & Mail,
September 20, 1996, page A16
(Editorial)
-
Deputy police chief likes tough-on-crime bill
Halifax Daily News,
September 20, 1996, page 4
(Susanne Hiller)
-
Criminal bill may clash with Charter
Halifax Daily News,
September 20, 1996, page 4
(Editorial)
-
Allan in Wonderland: Sentence first -- verdict afterwards
Halifax Daily News,
September 23, 1996
(Parker Barss Donham)
-
Electronic-monitoring law would curb freedom -- critics
Halifax Daily News,
September 24, 1996
(Canadian Press)
-
Tough new bill needs careful look
Ottawa Sun,
September 25, 1996
(Sean Durkan)
-
Rock to narrow use of electronic monitor
Globe & Mail,
December 4, 1996, page A3
(Anne McIlroy)
-
Rock abandons plan for tracking offenders
Hamilton Spectator, March 5, 1997,
(Stephen Bindman)
Parliamentary debate on Bill C-55
(from
Hansard):
(after clicking one of the links, search for C-55)
-
Monday, October 7th, 1996, 15:15
(Government Orders) (passed Second Reading)
-
Friday, October 4th, 1996, 12:15
(Government Orders)
-
Friday, October 4th, 1996, 10:00
(Government Orders)
-
Thursday, October 3rd, 1996, 15:05
(Government Orders)
-
Thursday, October 3rd, 1996, 12:05
(Government Orders)
-
Tuesday, September 24th, 1996, 15:05
(Government Orders)
-
Tuesday, September 17th, 1996, 10:15
(Routine Proceedings) (passed First Reading)